3 things I like about Anderson's article

The first thing i like about this article is that it explains clearly about both the traditional assessment and the alternative assessment.

Second thing i like about this article is the idea of the need to shift from traditional assessment to alternative assessment. It is a need to shift as different students have different learning styles. Students excellency in certain areas cannot be proven by pen and paper but it can be proven when they are given hands on activities as some students are not good in memorising they are good when it comes to doing hands on activities or practicality. Moreover, having examinations using pen and paper does not prove that a student is good in the real world.

Next thing i like about this article is that it stated clearly about the comparison of traditional and alternative assessment. We can see how they are compared the the difference between this 2 assessments in different area.